Re: You don't know what a Linux distribution is. Why should I have any confidence in this new project? Lightweight implementations do perform better because they don't cover everything. However, Rust gives rustls a big security advantage compared to OpenSSL or any other library written in C/C++.
However, if it fails faster when the first character of the key is bad, then all an attacker has to do is try combinations until they get a fast response ... and now they have the first part of the key. But I am skeptical of anything so utterly focused on speed. As a voidlinux maintainer, Iâm a long time LibreSSL user and proponent. This is something I really hate. LibreSSL is a fork of OpenSSL created in response to Heartbleed. About half of the free software people are SJW. Don't let your C zealotry blind you to obvious realities.
Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
It's a fucking open source project. If you install from the OpenSSL image, it's OpenSSL. What evidence do you have that it "leaves out all the corner cases"? Both LibreSSL and OpenSSL have their strengths and weaknesses.
On the contrary, we are still finding holes in OpenSSL that are many years old.
LibreSSLâs efforts are aimed at removing code considered useless for the target platforms,
As always, this research was funded thanks to the 25% research time offered at Doyensec.
Arduino | There were several bugs that caused it to fail to compile (I submitted patches where it was a LibreSSL issue) and there are continued issues elsewhere.
This page was last edited on 12 April 2020, at 13:55. 1 hour ago, PHP | That is almost certainly that posters idea of a test suite, and it is the wrong idea: with threads or networking the cyclomatic complexity increases so high that it becomes impossible to test a meaningful subset (other than the happy path, which can be a useful test but not against hacking).
You seem to be unable to read that CVE table.
In that scenario, cracking the key drops from X**N (some time raised to the power of how long the key is) down to X*N (the same time multiplied by the length of the key). Solutions should always be pushed.
God help you I'd you ever have to write network code or threaded code, you're not going to be able to write a test for every case, you'll need to develop new techniques.
Then they wouldn't benefit from the contributions of the community that could make the library more useful, sooner. Anyone who's ever read the OpenSSL code won't be surprised. OpenSSL initial release: Hooray!Bug found.
What are the benefits and weakness of these SSLs? some people who loudly proclaim their desire to see fewer barriers to advancement for women and minorities.
I would trust government studies way more than industry studies, at least in US, generally speaking.
macOS since 10.11 and on many other Linux distributions.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. The LibreSSL codebase is now nearly 70% the size of OpenSSL (237558 cloc vs 335485 cloc), while implementing a similar API on all the major modern operating systems. Comments owned by the poster.
We'll also mask dev-libs/openssl and keyword dev-libs/libressl-2.2.x. set OPENSSL_CONF=C:\OpenSSL-Win64\bin\openssl.cfg. Also, OpenSSL is probably the most commonly used TLS library out there written by a couple of mathematicians who used every trick in the book to get it to perform in the fastest way possible (security turned out to be less of a concern...). This includes the build scaffold and compatibility layer that builds portable LibreSSL from the OpenBSD source code. The direct CVE count comparison between the two shows that LibreSSL was indeed safer.
This is not allowed in ASN1, and it should not even be allowed in LibreSSL. It is rather amusing that design and auditing is used as an argument FOR using openssl. I think you are sticking in ideology where it does not belong. Many of these detectable errors, like buffer overflows, can have serious security implications. this is going to happen because openssl is so portable, and so many embedded vendors use it.
I can't tell you how crazy it is that some people don't recognize that a lot of security comes from design and auditing, and no magic compiler bypasses those requirements. LibreSSL is an API compatible replacement for OpenSSL,
Re: You don't know what a Linux distribution is. Why should I have any confidence in this new project? Lightweight implementations do perform better because they don't cover everything. However, Rust gives rustls a big security advantage compared to OpenSSL or any other library written in C/C++.
However, if it fails faster when the first character of the key is bad, then all an attacker has to do is try combinations until they get a fast response ... and now they have the first part of the key. But I am skeptical of anything so utterly focused on speed. As a voidlinux maintainer, Iâm a long time LibreSSL user and proponent. This is something I really hate. LibreSSL is a fork of OpenSSL created in response to Heartbleed. About half of the free software people are SJW. Don't let your C zealotry blind you to obvious realities.
Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
It's a fucking open source project. If you install from the OpenSSL image, it's OpenSSL. What evidence do you have that it "leaves out all the corner cases"? Both LibreSSL and OpenSSL have their strengths and weaknesses.
On the contrary, we are still finding holes in OpenSSL that are many years old.
LibreSSLâs efforts are aimed at removing code considered useless for the target platforms,
As always, this research was funded thanks to the 25% research time offered at Doyensec.
Arduino | There were several bugs that caused it to fail to compile (I submitted patches where it was a LibreSSL issue) and there are continued issues elsewhere.
This page was last edited on 12 April 2020, at 13:55. 1 hour ago, PHP | That is almost certainly that posters idea of a test suite, and it is the wrong idea: with threads or networking the cyclomatic complexity increases so high that it becomes impossible to test a meaningful subset (other than the happy path, which can be a useful test but not against hacking).
You seem to be unable to read that CVE table.
In that scenario, cracking the key drops from X**N (some time raised to the power of how long the key is) down to X*N (the same time multiplied by the length of the key). Solutions should always be pushed.
God help you I'd you ever have to write network code or threaded code, you're not going to be able to write a test for every case, you'll need to develop new techniques.
Then they wouldn't benefit from the contributions of the community that could make the library more useful, sooner. Anyone who's ever read the OpenSSL code won't be surprised. OpenSSL initial release: Hooray!Bug found.
What are the benefits and weakness of these SSLs? some people who loudly proclaim their desire to see fewer barriers to advancement for women and minorities.
I would trust government studies way more than industry studies, at least in US, generally speaking.
macOS since 10.11 and on many other Linux distributions.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. The LibreSSL codebase is now nearly 70% the size of OpenSSL (237558 cloc vs 335485 cloc), while implementing a similar API on all the major modern operating systems. Comments owned by the poster.
We'll also mask dev-libs/openssl and keyword dev-libs/libressl-2.2.x. set OPENSSL_CONF=C:\OpenSSL-Win64\bin\openssl.cfg. Also, OpenSSL is probably the most commonly used TLS library out there written by a couple of mathematicians who used every trick in the book to get it to perform in the fastest way possible (security turned out to be less of a concern...). This includes the build scaffold and compatibility layer that builds portable LibreSSL from the OpenBSD source code. The direct CVE count comparison between the two shows that LibreSSL was indeed safer.
This is not allowed in ASN1, and it should not even be allowed in LibreSSL. It is rather amusing that design and auditing is used as an argument FOR using openssl. I think you are sticking in ideology where it does not belong. Many of these detectable errors, like buffer overflows, can have serious security implications. this is going to happen because openssl is so portable, and so many embedded vendors use it.
I can't tell you how crazy it is that some people don't recognize that a lot of security comes from design and auditing, and no magic compiler bypasses those requirements. LibreSSL is an API compatible replacement for OpenSSL,
A reflection of general cluelessness and poor planning. 2 hours ago, Dart | Now if this were an non-affiliated third party publishing these stats I might believe it more. Sure, Rust is "memory safe," but that doesn't mean that it doesn't pick predictable keys, or that it doesn't leave itself vulnerable to side-channel attacks in some way, or any of the other numerous ways crypto can go wrong. You could easily qualify.
Re: You don't know what a Linux distribution is. Why should I have any confidence in this new project? Lightweight implementations do perform better because they don't cover everything. However, Rust gives rustls a big security advantage compared to OpenSSL or any other library written in C/C++.
However, if it fails faster when the first character of the key is bad, then all an attacker has to do is try combinations until they get a fast response ... and now they have the first part of the key. But I am skeptical of anything so utterly focused on speed. As a voidlinux maintainer, Iâm a long time LibreSSL user and proponent. This is something I really hate. LibreSSL is a fork of OpenSSL created in response to Heartbleed. About half of the free software people are SJW. Don't let your C zealotry blind you to obvious realities.
Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
It's a fucking open source project. If you install from the OpenSSL image, it's OpenSSL. What evidence do you have that it "leaves out all the corner cases"? Both LibreSSL and OpenSSL have their strengths and weaknesses.
On the contrary, we are still finding holes in OpenSSL that are many years old.
LibreSSLâs efforts are aimed at removing code considered useless for the target platforms,
As always, this research was funded thanks to the 25% research time offered at Doyensec.
Arduino | There were several bugs that caused it to fail to compile (I submitted patches where it was a LibreSSL issue) and there are continued issues elsewhere.
This page was last edited on 12 April 2020, at 13:55. 1 hour ago, PHP | That is almost certainly that posters idea of a test suite, and it is the wrong idea: with threads or networking the cyclomatic complexity increases so high that it becomes impossible to test a meaningful subset (other than the happy path, which can be a useful test but not against hacking).
You seem to be unable to read that CVE table.
In that scenario, cracking the key drops from X**N (some time raised to the power of how long the key is) down to X*N (the same time multiplied by the length of the key). Solutions should always be pushed.
God help you I'd you ever have to write network code or threaded code, you're not going to be able to write a test for every case, you'll need to develop new techniques.
Then they wouldn't benefit from the contributions of the community that could make the library more useful, sooner. Anyone who's ever read the OpenSSL code won't be surprised. OpenSSL initial release: Hooray!Bug found.
What are the benefits and weakness of these SSLs? some people who loudly proclaim their desire to see fewer barriers to advancement for women and minorities.
I would trust government studies way more than industry studies, at least in US, generally speaking.
macOS since 10.11 and on many other Linux distributions.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. The LibreSSL codebase is now nearly 70% the size of OpenSSL (237558 cloc vs 335485 cloc), while implementing a similar API on all the major modern operating systems. Comments owned by the poster.
We'll also mask dev-libs/openssl and keyword dev-libs/libressl-2.2.x. set OPENSSL_CONF=C:\OpenSSL-Win64\bin\openssl.cfg. Also, OpenSSL is probably the most commonly used TLS library out there written by a couple of mathematicians who used every trick in the book to get it to perform in the fastest way possible (security turned out to be less of a concern...). This includes the build scaffold and compatibility layer that builds portable LibreSSL from the OpenBSD source code. The direct CVE count comparison between the two shows that LibreSSL was indeed safer.
This is not allowed in ASN1, and it should not even be allowed in LibreSSL. It is rather amusing that design and auditing is used as an argument FOR using openssl. I think you are sticking in ideology where it does not belong. Many of these detectable errors, like buffer overflows, can have serious security implications. this is going to happen because openssl is so portable, and so many embedded vendors use it.
I can't tell you how crazy it is that some people don't recognize that a lot of security comes from design and auditing, and no magic compiler bypasses those requirements. LibreSSL is an API compatible replacement for OpenSSL,
